World View | Justin Trudeau fired a gun without a bullet

By Anil Trigunayat 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau jumped the gun without the bullet as is the want of many politicians, who wish to create sensationalism by ranting out baseless accusations of foreign interference without any credible evidence. This is often a tactic of such politicians to simply marshal the public opinion to salvage themselves. But it is a given that they don’t gain as much as they lose. 

However, a sensitive subject like harbouring and enabling extremism and terrorists makes it even more questionable since it puts the country’s reputation at stake. Do Canadians support terrorism or extremism, of course not, but whether their current leadership does it— is a question that has been duly proved by the Trudeau legacy. The case of slain Canadian Sikh separatist militant leader Harmit Singh Nijjar (killed by masked gunmen in June) and Trudeau and his foreign minister eulogising him, left no doubt that perhaps he and many others like him thrived due to their (the extremists’) patronage. 

You May LikeAWS Cloud: Powering One-click Deployment Solutions with CustomizationInnovate with AWSSign Up  by Taboola Sponsored Links ALSO READ: Who was Hardeep Singh Nijjar, slain Khalistan leader, the cause of fresh India-Canada diplomatic rowMoreover, Trudeau accused India — a country that follows zero tolerance to terrorism policy and has suffered from violent extremism and terrorism for nearly five decades from across the border. India has also faced externally induced insurgency which is perpetrated with the support of external powers who have made terrorism the fundamental of their foreign policy with utter impunity from their benefactors and the vocalists in the West. Trudeau seems to be taking Canada in that direction by actively jeopardising the relationship with India. An irony indeed.His diplomatic indiscretions are far too many. When he came on a bilateral visit in 2018, when India gave him a chance to redeem the relationship, he brought along a Khalistani extremist leader even though he and his family went about shouting their Indian wardrobe. Superficiality and suspicion go hand in hand. This time at G20 he also made remarks that would embolden the Khalistani extremists in his country.Under the garb of democracy, Trudeau allowed Khalistani Referendum in a direct affront to India’s sovereignty. If he loves Khalistan so much, why doesn’t he change the name “British Columbia” to “Canadian State of Khalistan,” perhaps he could win another election.Coming to his G20 Summit in New Delhi, PM Modi extended due courtesies to the visiting dignitary, despite India’s deep concerns about separatism and terrorism being directed from Canadian soil against India directly or through the Pakistani deep state whose objective was clearly aligned to destabilise India.Apparently, Trudeau raised the extra-judicial killing of Nijjar and the potential hand of Indian agencies with Prime Minister Modi in Delhi. It was outright rejected as absurd and unsubstantiated with any evidence whatsoever. On the other hand, PM Modi firmly took up various cases, incidents and threats against Indian citizens and diplomats and asked Canada to deal with them appropriately. A statement by the Ministry of External Affairs articulated; “We are a democratic polity with a strong commitment to the rule of law.”Such unsubstantiated allegations seek to shift the focus from Khalistani terrorists and extremists, who have been provided shelter in Canada and continue to threaten India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The inaction of the Canadian government on this matter has been a long-standing and continuing concern. That Canadian political figures have openly expressed sympathy for such elements remains a matter of deep concern. The space given in Canada to a range of illegal activities including murders, human trafficking and organised crime is ‘not new’, saying it all.  Nearly every single act of murder and violence in Punjab had a link in Canada. Only two days ago a Congress politician was killed in daylight which was commissioned from Canada and claimed on a Facebook post. No doubt the actions and politically motivated riots in 1984 did hurt the sensibilities of many Sikhs but the wounds are being healed. Despite this, the Sikhs are proud Indians. Even in Canada, it is ONLY a miniscule yet well-oiled politically vociferous group who overtly prevail on the silent majority of Sikhs and Panjabis who constitute the second largest population outside of Punjab. I guess this is the time for them to speak up.It is not a question of Canada but of Counter-Terrorism where India cannot compromise because it impinges directly on the country’s security and sovereignty. Hopefully, the Five Eyes partners of Canada understand it with their eyes open. Terrorism and Extremism cannot be countered as long as the world powers and countries play around with ‘my terrorist is good and those not with me are rogues’. ALSO READ: Unraveling the India-Canada rift: Recent incidents straining diplomatic relationsTerrorism is Terrorism’.Khalas! In the case of Canada, there is a trail going back four decades from Trudeau senior to Trudeau Junior. Although they started accepting immigrants including the illegal ones like Nijjar with great alacrity and enabled and provided them to continue their tirade against India. Several militant outfits were raised, which eventually became political actors as well, especially out of British Columbia.Place of worship — the holy Gurudwaras became their legal habitat and all this with the connivance and political patronage. Kanishka crash when 329 precious lives were lost — no credible action was taken and eventually the criminals were also set free emboldening their enterprise. Gurmeet Singh of the New Democratic Party and known India baiter is also an alliance partner of Justin Trudeau whose own popularity has tanked and hence he has become increasingly more insecure and dependent on such extremist constituents. During the farmers agitation (2021) he openly issued statements which amounted to interference in India’s internal affairs. Hence it is no wonder that they sing songs in their praise. What an irony!Result is that these extremist elements have become vociferous and dangerous and are threatening Indian diplomats, citizens and interests apart from creating problems in India.After the claims made by Trudeau in the House of Commons and his foreign Minister asking an Indian diplomat to leave, the situation has worsened. All these faux pas, without any shred of evidence which has even been averred by the Opposition Leader in the Canadian Parliament.His Five Eyes partners also do not appear convinced even as they have expressed some concerns and want the perpetrators to be brought to justice. Instead of confronting and taking action against terrorists in their country they are raising the bogey of sovereignty which smacks of utter hypocrisy. They were behind President Bush who, talking of 9/11 terrorists, claimed that “we shall smoke them out’ wherever they are and invasion of Afghanistan began when no Afghan was involved in the 9/11 attacks. But the world stood with them since terrorism and extremists are universal threats and global solidarity is a must, but probably not for the Trudeaus.Meanwhile, bilateral relations continue to go down with threat perceptions increasing for Indians in Canada. Discussion on India-Canada Free Trade agreement have been paused or suspended. Both sides have expelled a diplomat each and more may follow and we might be looking at downgrading the diplomatic representation as well. The Indian government has issued an advisory to Indians stating; “​In view of growing anti-India activities and politically-condoned hate crimes and criminal violence in Canada, all Indian nationals there and those contemplating travel are urged to exercise utmost caution. Recently, threats have particularly targeted Indian diplomats and sections of the Indian community who oppose the anti-India agenda.” India has suspended visa services to Canadian citizens to ensure its security.All this for the snub and snobbery of the Canadian Prime Minister who seems to be hell-bent on placing his country in the company of some of our neighbours for whom cross-border terrorism and its sponsorship is an article of faith.Hope the good Canadian citizens will see it as a wake-up call.—The author, Amb. Anil Trigunayat, is a former Indian Ambassador to Jordan, Libya and Malta, and currently heads the West Asia Experts Group at Vivekananda International Foundation. Views expressed are personal.