China ‘Tightens Screws’ On Its Military; Stringent Rules For Top PLA Commanders Harsher Than Mao Era

OPED by Lt Gen. PR Shankar (Retired)

The Eurasian Times @https://www.eurasiantimes.com/china-tightens-screws-on-military-stringent-social/

The dictum in the Communist Party of China from the days of Mao was that the Party must control the Gun. All leaders, past and present have endeavoured  that the PLA is kept under political check. Xi Jinping has taken this dictum to a new level. From one perspective it appears that Xi Jinping’s purges are tightening the control on the gun. However when analysed in a wider perspective, there is more than what meets the eye.   Advertisements

REPORT THIS AD

Xi Jinping’s recent purge of nine PLA generals has made international headlines. Two of them oversaw satellite launches and manned space missions. One admiral was instrumental in expanding China’s foot print in the  South China Sea. There was also a PLARF commander who was involved in scripting China’s nuclear policy. Five were past or serving top commanders of the PLARF. Two of these  nine served in the Central Military Commission (CMC). Accompanying all this is the sacking of three top executives of NORINCO (China North Industries Group Corporation) and China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation. In addition a former chairman of China Ship Building Industry has been jailed. The honours board is huge this time. This targeted crackdown has political ramification beyond mere corruption and bribery. There is a lot amiss in the PLA.

The whiff that all was not normal and that something was unusual happening came to light in Jun 23. South China Morning Post then reported that the PLA issued  some ‘unprecedented’ rules for top commanders’ social lives in move not tried ‘even in Mao Zedong’s times’. These rules  were for control of  the social activities of serving and retired senior PLA officers. They set out a code of conduct for dealing with Communist Party officials, government bodies and state-owned enterprises, social organisations, the media, academic and research bodies, ethnic minority and religious groups, foreign institutions and family members as well as people they could meet online. These stringent rules meant that the PLA top guns could barely speak to their own images!

Soon after that all hell broke loose in July 23 as Xi carried out a set of high-profile sackings unceremoniously. Three top generals of the PLARF were dumped.  Qin Gang the foreign minister  and Li Shangfu the defence minister who were handpicked by Xi Jinping and inducted into the hallowed portals of Standing Committee of the Politburo have simply disappeared from public sight since then. At the same time it also surfaced that the whereabouts of former Defence Minister Wei Fenghe, were also not known.  He has not been seen since then. Further it was announced that Lt Gen Wang Shaojun died of unknown illness after an unexplained three-month delay. He was responsible for the security of the country’s senior leaders and was with Xi Jinping during his visit to Hong Kong in 2017. 

Around that time in July,  Xi summoned PLA’s top military brass to Beijing and read the riot act to them. He told them “loyalty to the party is at the heart of armed forces’ goals”. The PLA Daily echoed his call for tight political discipline to avoid setbacks and losses. Xi Jinping was putting the PLA on track to toeing Communist Party diktats. Afterall the party must ‘command the gun’. It was very evident that Xi Jinping and China were under threat beyond the normal that he for him to call such a meeting and then publicise it!  

in Aug 23,  the indication that there was bribery and corruption affecting the quality of PLA equipment came into the open. General Zhang Youxia the first vice-chair of China’s Central Military Commission held a two day meeting.  He called  on the PLAs military’s procurement and technological development system  to improve the “quality of our weaponry…so we can win any battles, strengthen our combat ability, and protect the lives of our soldiers”. He also exhorted those in the meeting to  “deepen rectification of quality controls of active supplies”. Very clearly while the PLA procedures were being tightened up. The lack of quality and degradation of the operational readiness of its rocket force was out in the open. 

The military purge must also  be seen against the wider purge going on. Almost every sector in China has been under fire. Finance, state owned enterprises,  railways, energy, sports, tobacco, agriculture, healthcare and infrastructure have all been targeted by Xi’s corruption hunters. As per latest reports Xi has given a heads up and a free rein to his corruption busters. He has personally instructed them to show no mercy in the “severe and complex” battle and continue with “persistent purification of the political ecosystem”. He has also called for ‘heavier punishments’ and a focus on “high-risk” areas. Xi’s thought calls for “self-revolution”. Public  confessions in the best traditions of Maoism are being put to practise. The focus on the military bureaucracy, at least apparently,  is on bribery relating to the sale of positions,  embezzlement in logistics departments and  contracts. All these  undermine military readiness. 

What is different between the earlier and current purges? The earlier purges were to get the Party back into the saddle to ‘control the Gun’. These purges are different. For one the frequency,  intensity and level has increased enormously. They are happening at a time when nothing seems to be going China’s way. Its economy is struggling. Political discontent is clearly  in the air. In the past year and a half there have been rumours of coup/assassination attempts. Xi Jinping has spoken of colour revolutions and outside interference. He has barely travelled outside China. When he has done so, his movements have been shrouded in secrecy lest he meets the fate of Prighozin or Lin Biao. Is Xi Jinping feeling threatened personally? Well he should be for all the purges he has carried out. 

Look at it any way. These whole sale purges could be to root out corruption, professional incompetence or political disloyalty. All these indicate that there is something amiss in the PLA. It could be lack of mutual trust and confidence between Xi and his military. It could be sub-standard  equipment or morale due to wide spread corruption. It could be a case of poor leadership and lack of command level cohesion. The PLA leadership could have been infiltrated by outside forces. It could be a case of power plays and political wrangling. It could be a case of Xi eliminating any whiff of competition. It could be all of the above in bits and pieces. In all cases, these purges undermine  the operational effectiveness of the PLA. 

What will the result be? Xi will have to be constantly looking over his shoulder and be worried if the PLA can deliver when the time comes. Hence his global ambitions need tempering. Especially since his cutting edge tools of global power projection – the PLARF and PLASSF are under intense scrutiny. This is compounded by the fact that not only the top level leadership of the PLA but leaders of most sectors of the economy have been axed in recent times. The debilitating effect on the larger tools of hard power – economy, diplomacy  and military is telling. One can’t keep axing leadership across the board and still expect the system to be firing on all cylinders. In fact the opposite is true. All cylinders of the Chinese  system are misfiring! It is matter of viewpoint if the party is controlling the Gun or if  Russian roulette with Chinese characteristics is being played out.   

All this should logically put China’s global ambitions on ice. However Xi Jinping is made of hardy stuff. Being the ideological man that he is, he will not let go. He will continue with his dream of rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and establishment of a Sino Centric world come what may. All indications point in that direction. Accordingly, India must be consigned to a China which is unstable internally and externally aggressive with huge mercantilist behaviour.  The danger will be when Xi wants to divert from his internal dissensions and externalise militarily with his wobbly gun. India needs to look out for that!